Chanter - Old or New?

A forum about Uilleann (Irish) pipes and the surly people who play them.
Post Reply
User avatar
nitterwhiskers
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 12:13 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Reading, Berkshire

Chanter - Old or New?

Post by nitterwhiskers »

I recently purchased a practice set, the seller described the set as being vintage - pre 1900's (at least the chanter was of this age). Having received the set I am feeling less than convinced that this is a vintage set, but being a total novice at this instrument I can only base my feeling on experience of collecting and playing antique flutes. One thing that stands out are the edges of the tone holes feel fairly sharp not at all what I would expect of an instrument of this age, especially where playing involves a lot of finger slides. Anyway I have a few pictures of the chanter in question and would be grateful for any advice.

Image

Image

Image
andymay
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:35 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: North East England

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by andymay »

Hi,

Fingerholes wear pretty slowly on most hardwoods and it would happen as a result of use, rather than age neccessarily. So what you have could be old but just not been played much i suppose.

A bigger clue would be the pitch/length of the chanter. If it's a 14 1/4 - 14 1/2 inch concert D chanter - and it looks like it probably is - then it's unlikely (though not impossible) to be pre-1900. A bit of a generalization but probably true!!

None of that would make it a better or worse chanter of course.

Any idea what wood it is? Looks almost like laburnum in the photos.

Cheers

Andy
User avatar
rorybbellows
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 7:50 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: the cutting edge

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by rorybbellows »

The hole size suggests concert pitch and the overall appearance looks modernish. Pre 1900 probably mean the chanter was made before 7.OO O,clock in the evening


RORY
I'm Spartacus .
User avatar
PJ
Posts: 5889
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:23 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: ......................................................................................................
Location: Baychimo

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by PJ »

The turning looks similar to a Kevin Thompson chanter I have.
PJ
User avatar
MTGuru
Posts: 18663
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:45 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by MTGuru »

rorybbellows wrote:Pre 1900 probably mean the chanter was made before 7.OO O,clock in the evening
:lol:
Vivat diabolus in musica! MTGuru's (old) GG Clips / Blackbird Clips

Joel Barish: Is there any risk of brain damage?
Dr. Mierzwiak: Well, technically speaking, the procedure is brain damage.
User avatar
an seanduine
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:06 pm
antispam: No
Location: just outside Xanadu

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by an seanduine »

Ermmm, PJ, the chanter looks nothing like my Kevin Thompson chanter, circa 1989.

Bob
Not everything you can count, counts. And not everything that counts, can be counted

The Expert's Mind has few possibilities.
The Beginner's mind has endless possibilities.
Shunryu Suzuki, Roshi
User avatar
PJ
Posts: 5889
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:23 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: ......................................................................................................
Location: Baychimo

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by PJ »

Well the turning on the bottom resembles my chanter (circa 1995).
PJ
User avatar
Hans-Joerg
Posts: 788
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 3:37 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Germany, half an hour west of "Old Brunswick" (Braunschweig < Brunswieck)

Re: Chanter - Old or New?

Post by Hans-Joerg »

Looks like Makassar-Ebony - and the brighter stripes still are bright. So, I´d agree that 1900 is 19.00 :x
Post Reply