I suppose a lot has to do with YOUR perspective of the whole thing...
If Froment's chanters are based on a design that is sharp -or- already has a need for a rush -or- has certain tuning issues (yes Uilliam, bad design) It appears (to me) at some point in his pipemaking career, rather than re-design the bore, Froment decided to make a rush standard.
It's there. So be it. That's what he is offering... get over it. Does it detract from the quality and workmanship of this pipes? Judging from his wait list... No.
Tony,
You've made a very fair and reasonable point. When we get to this level of pipe making skills, it is down to personal taste.
You may be right in saying that at some point Alain may have said, "feck it. I'm close enough, an auld rush will do the trick" But some how I don't think thats the case. Or maybe I don't want to believe thats the case.
I think the rush option is a handy quick fix to a tuning issue but I don't believe that it should come as a standard fixture to a brand new chanter. It's like buying a new car and getting a free can of WD40 for when the engine won't start.
What happens when the chanter goes sharper. Another rush? Your bottom D will go to hell then. Thats no good.
Alain is a fine craftsman, engineer and instrument maker. His flat sets are superb and his concert drones and regulators are excellent too, in my opinion. I just don't like his D chanters and the rush deal is part of that.
I suppose I just have to get over that. Ah, no I don't, I just don't want one....
Mind you, take a look out there and see the amount of pipers with Alains D set with other makers chanters, theres a good few in Ireland.
Tommy