Polluting/spamming the forums

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
Locked
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

Brian Lee wrote:The boards here have become much the same thing. Lots of static. Lots of noise, and less and less of the root cause they were initially created to support. Waaaaaay back when, back when Teri K was in her teens probably , we didn't have a splintered board. Everyone who came here did so to talk about whistles, or music, or a particular maker etc. We even had many more makers takling then. I wonder how many of our current numbers have even read through Dale's site? It's called Chiff and Fipple - and it deals almost exclusively with the Irish tin whistle. There is a small section on home gorilla breeding, but apart from that, it's solid.

Over the past few years, it's been said that the boards have reached a "critical mass", and were just not manageable as they once were. However true that may be, it strikes me as highly curious that there never really seemed to be a need for management at the onset...but now we have 4 moderators just trying to keep up with civility.

As has been pointed out before, there are PLENTY of boards on the internet for discussion of any topic you like: Politics, religion, more politics, sexual orientations, genome splicing, the cost of fruit/monkeys/spare organs in India...hell, you can probably find a forum for how to make money starting up your own fake Irish pub. And yet the balance here is more towards this trend and constantly growing further away from it's origins.

I've found that I post less and less anymore, and many of our more experienced posters (and players for that matter) have given up completely on C&F as a whole ages ago. As it stands, I fully expect to drop further and further down the total posts rank and file. If it's true we *have* reached this mystical critical mass, my fear is that C&F is due to go supernova at any time...with nothing left but a dead core...just your every day, average black hole.
Hi Brian---- where I'm getting confused is are you talking about the individual forums or the Pub?

It seems to me, as Wormdiet pointed out, that within the individual music forums (UP, whistle, flute, ITM) that people stay on the topic quite well. If there are not interesting topics for you in the UP forum, that is certainly a problem, but it does not seem like it would be related to people bringing up topics that have nothing to do with music. It must be related to something else.

If you are talking about the Pub, is it that you just don't like having an anything-goes Pub? Are you saying that in the old days people in the Pub all talked about music? I thought, but I could certainly be wrong, that the Pub was created to keep conversations that weren't pertinent to the instruments or music out of the music forums. If you don't like the Pub, then could you just go to the UP forum and not go to the Pub?

I guess I feel sort of irked because here are all these advanced people saying they want to have interesting conversations about music and instruments but they can't. There is nothing more that a lot of us would like than to hear some interesting discussions about music or the instrument we are trying to play. Is it that beginners butt in too much? That you would have to explain so much to them about an esoteric topic that it would become not worth it to bring something up? I have seen some knowledgeable people get treated quite badly for their efforts to pass on information or give help. I have seen instrument makers get treated quite badly as well. Is it that there aren't enough advanced people remaining to get a good conversation going? Is it really the Pub that is stopping the conversations about music and instruments? Why couldn't these conversations take place in the music forums? I am just frustrated because I would like to hear the conversations that people are alluding to. Maybe if some of the advanced people still here started some discussions, other people might come back. Maybe it is more a companionship thing than a discussion thing. I don't know. Oh well.
User avatar
Will O'B
Posts: 1169
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:53 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: The Other Side Of The Glen (i.e. A Long Way From Tipperary)
Contact:

Post by Will O'B »

HOLY SMOKES!!! This thread is just over 24 hours old and already has almost 3,000 hits and 164 replies. I wonder if this is some sort of record?

This is not, by the way, an attempt at thread hijacking. Please continue with your discussion.

Will O'Ban
So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.


Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38233
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

emmline wrote:
Nanohedron wrote:Does anyone have sheetmusic for Money Money Money, and Chicitita, Dancing Queen, Waterloo, and Take A Chance on Me? Whistle tabs would be great. Oh, and you guys are gonna flip when you hear this: I have a Susato signed by Anagret! How flippin' cool is that?!?

I forgot what about The Winner Takes It All?

Thanks!
This is a blatant, not to mention shocking, fabrication, as Nano would know how to spell Chiquitita.

edit: Oh. I see that horse has left the gate.
Thank you. I was of the opinion that it was not for me to bray about my spelling habits (which are not without error, mind you...not that there's anything wrong with that, of course), not to mention my anal-obsessive PUNCTUATION issues (see embedded quote). :wink:

Since no one has addressed my sincere question about what ought to constitute the vaguely waved-about term "manners" in the Pub, I'll ask another. If C&F has degenerated so, what then should we discuss in the Pub? I contribute infrequently to the Flute and Trad fora, and even less so to the Pipes forum, but my purpose when doing so is for the greatest part on-topic. My participation in the Pub is for sheer fun. I had no idea that this is a bad thing. If there's something unbecoming about that, I'd really like to know. Seriously.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
anniemcu
Posts: 8024
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:42 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: A little left of center, and 100 miles from St. Louis
Contact:

Post by anniemcu »

And another thing....

As I play more and more, I have fewer and fewer questions myself (not speaking for others, but figure this is probably true for others as well). I do try to contribute when there is a question on the Whistle board that I have knowledge or opinion on. I know that when I *do* have a whistle related question, there are plenty of folks there to help.

Aside from that, I find the company here in the Pub (created specifically for non-whistle related discourse within the community of whistle folk, after much discussion on the plusses and minuses of doing so), very positive and an enjoyable contribution to my day. I find the folks generally accepting and supportive, and of wickedly good mind for pouncing on puns and word games, and full of humor.

I am not about to desert such a rich source of input in my life!
anniemcu
---
"You are what you do, not what you claim to believe." -Gene A. Statler
---
"Olé to you, none-the-less!" - Elizabeth Gilbert
---
http://www.sassafrassgrove.com
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38233
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

anniemcu wrote:And another thing....

As I play more and more, I have fewer and fewer questions myself (not speaking for others, but figure this is probably true for others as well). I do try to contribute when there is a question on the Whistle board that I have knowledge or opinion on. I know that when I *do* have a whistle related question, there are plenty of folks there to help.

Aside from that, I find the company here in the Pub (created specifically for non-whistle related discourse within the community of whistle folk, after much discussion on the plusses and minuses of doing so), very positive and an enjoyable contribution to my day. I find the folks generally accepting and supportive, and of wickedly good mind for pouncing on puns and word games, and full of humor.

I am not about to desert such a rich source of input in my life!
Just so. It's the same with me. I learn much from the other fora. To be frank, I find the objections couched in the "Good Old Days" paradigm to be puzzling. What's lacking? I really mean this.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7703
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Post by chas »

Nanohedron wrote:Since no one has addressed my sincere question about what ought to constitute the vaguely waved-about term "manners" in the Pub, I'll ask another. If C&F has degenerated so, what then should we discuss in the Pub?
I'll bite on this one. Many have mentioned "You don't have to read threads that don't interest you." I agree with that, and I also have no complaint with the volume of posting. I think my complaint is with the number of threads. Put the political stuff in the political sticky. The political sticky was created specifically in response to the burgeoning number of political threads that were making it increasingly difficult to find the threads we were interested in and had already posted to. If I don't log on for a day, many threads of interest have slipped to the second or third page. Also, label threads with something descriptive, something more than "interesting."

As far as manners specifically go, we've been through that many times. There's the "reasonable person principle" as well as Dale's oft-paraphrased, treat each other as though you're in each others' living rooms.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
missy
Posts: 5833
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by missy »

here's an example of why I don't post more often to music threads:

In the whistle forum currently is a question:
"my wife is learing the violin and i've started the whistle we would like to play one of the slow airs together [maybe cailin deas cruite na mbo] but with two melody instruments who plays what?if anyone of you knowledgeable folk could enlighten me i would be gratefull"

"Ah!" - I thought when I first read this, I can answer this because all of Tom's and my playing is duo driven.

Then I started to read the responses:
"I am no expert, but isn't Irish music is typically played in unison?"
"Some would make a strong case for airs being solo pieces (and I would tend to agree) and irish music being essentially a melodic music (and I'd agree again). "

So - even though I know a lot about duet playing, and could probably contribute an answer or ideas, I evidently do not know enough about Irish music and that it's not to be played with harmonies.

And therefore - I skip answering.

Here in the pub - we can get into "arguments" and disagreements, and for the most part, even if we don't agree with the other, we don't get TOO beligerant about it. I honestly have felt in most cases when I've posted in the whistle forum (unless I've been asking a question) - my thoughts or ideas aren't really welcome (as they wouldn't have been in the above example).

I also went back and read Murphy's original post in this thread. One question he asked that I didn't answer is what instruments "we" play. I play (and teach and perform) mountain dulcimer (I tend to concentrate on the bass dulcimer - Tom plays the regular voiced one, along with a resonator dulcimer). I also dabble with penny whistle, bodhran and other percussion. I grew up playing piano. We play anything from Renaissance through Celtic, through Old Time, Bluegrass, Traditional American, to Rock and 60's surf music.
Missy

"When facts are few, experts are many"

http://www.strothers.com
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

missy wrote:here's an example of why I don't post more often to music threads:

In the whistle forum currently is a question:
"my wife is learing the violin and i've started the whistle we would like to play one of the slow airs together [maybe cailin deas cruite na mbo] but with two melody instruments who plays what?if anyone of you knowledgeable folk could enlighten me i would be gratefull"

"Ah!" - I thought when I first read this, I can answer this because all of Tom's and my playing is duo driven.

Then I started to read the responses:

"I am no expert, but isn't Irish music is typically played in unison?"

"Some would make a strong case for airs being solo pieces (and I would tend to agree) and irish music being essentially a melodic music (and I'd agree again). "

So - even though I know a lot about duet playing, and could probably contribute an answer or ideas, I evidently do not know enough about Irish music and that it's not to be played with harmonies.

And therefore - I skip answering.

.

Quite honestly posts like this can get me furious for their mean spirited stupidity.Reactions like this could really turn people away from replying to posts on the music forums.

It's apparently quite convenient for missy to quote the first half of my reply in <a href="http://chiffboard.mati.ca/viewtopic.php?t=31827">this thread</a> (the second quote in her post, also conveniently put together with a perfectly legitimate comment from another poster. There is no denying Irish music is an essentially melody driven music) and than omitting the second half of the post which began: 'This doesn't mean it can't be done..' followed by a couple of examples of string ensembles who did have a fair go at playing harmonies and mixing trad and clasical approaches and a recommendation to listen to those and develop an ear for the material to do it justice. If that puts you of you only have yourself to blame. But I find it extremely irritating to have that post served up here as discouraging.
Last edited by Cayden on Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jGilder
Posts: 3452
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:25 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Post by jGilder »

I feel like a relative newcomer to this website (even though I have posted more than say -- Murphy) and I didn't walk in through the front door where the whistle players do. Since I play both concertina and flute (as well as whistle and bodhran) I prefer to discuss ITM with the folks at thesession.org. (I discovered that site first)

I was impressed that the site creators here at the C&F established a forum where people that have the music in common (or at least an interest in it) could talk about anything that came to mind -- just like in a pub. I'm not the only one who recognizes the quality of this feature, as demonstrated by the huge popularity. But it's very interesting to see the response that "old timers" have to this newer addition to their cyber homeland.



Too Many Threads

Of course there will be an increased number of threads on a popular website such as this, but I heard more than one person saying that they can't find the thread they like when they come back... that it has slipped out of site onto another page. The truth is that it takes a couple of days for a topic to slip off the first page and when it does it's still easy to find. This is really just an inability to accept the change, or a resentment of topics that don't interest them or they find uncomfortable. But instead of admitting that -- they choose to attack the topics of the threads and exaggerate minor problems.



Political and Religious Threads

For obvious reasons these threads tend to become more passionate but are wildly popular. I am not the only one that starts or contributes to them, obviously, but I do notice that some people have a tendency to try to burn them down instead of responding reasonably. The usual pattern is that a subject is presented and then the response will be an often baseless attack of the premise with insults. When the person who presented the material defends their position the response to that is often more insult and innuendo from people that are uncomfortable with the direction that the evidence is taking the discussion.

In the time I've been here I've noticed that many contributors are maturing in how they adapt and have toned down their responses. (myself included) Some people couldn't -- and they left... so be it. These are all growing pains, and are expected, but there are still a few people around who would rather burn the whole thing down anyway.

The bottom line is that if everyone is going to be able to handle controversial topics they're going to have to reexamine their behavior on the board. I've said before that there are some brilliant minds in this forum and we have the opportunity to learn a lot about the world we live in and each other right here on a message board about whistles and flutes -- amazing.



Fun and Fluff

The funny and random sort of stuff is a great diversion and a nice way to have fun and get to know each other as just people. It doesn't have to be related to anything particular and is either thought provoking or good for a laugh. There are far more of these sorts of threads than any other and I have no complaint that they're making it hard to find the political threads or any such nonsense like that. It's all good -- isn't it?



It's a Pub

To call this forum a "pub" is perfect, as has been pointed out, because all these things take place in pubs. There is only one thing that isn't appreciated in pubs or here, and that’s bad manners. Some people seem to think that posting threads about subjects they have no interest in or are uncomfortable with is "bad manners," but I think taking unfair pot-shots at the people posting them or contributing to them is really what constitutes bad manners. If you went into a pub and walked over to a table where people were having a political or religious discussion and you told them they shouldn't be having discussions like that and they're all stupid -- you'd be escorted to the door.



This is a Great Place!

You guys have a popular forum here with great people and great potential -- relax -- enjoy it. The "Good Old Days" are just that, and if everyone keeps pointing fingers and espousing unwarranted complaints about what is happening here -- it will fade away prematurely -- and will be missed -- just like the Good Old Days.
User avatar
missy
Posts: 5833
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by missy »

Peter Laban wrote:

Quite honestly posts like this can get me furious for their mean spirited stupidity.Reactions like this could really turn people away from replying to posts on the music forums.

It's apparently quite convenient for missy to quote the first half of my reply in <a href="http://chiffboard.mati.ca/viewtopic.php?t=31827">this thread</a> (the second quote in her post, also conveniently put together with a perfectly legitimate comment from another poster.
Gee - I'm sorry to be so mean spirited and stupid - which is why I didn't reply to the post in the whistle forum in the first place. I cut and pasted the quotes to THIS forum because, honestly - I don't know how to quote between one forum and put it on another - you know - the stupid part??

As to the rest of your quote "This doesn't mean it can't be done" - that's supposed to make me feel good about adding to the original? Sorry - I read it to mean "it's not usually played that way, although some may do so".

See - again - this is why I don't post to the whistle forum - I'm too stupid and mean spirited..........
Missy

"When facts are few, experts are many"

http://www.strothers.com
User avatar
Blackwood
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 12:51 pm

Post by Blackwood »

Just scanned the thread and if i may add a few quick thoughts:

For Murphy: Increasingly in society I noticed a trend of trying to curb discussion (i've made that point in several threads) Dale knows i disagree with him on locking certain threads for example, but i've come to accept it as I don't think his intent is malicious. But in larger society i notice people and groups of people trying to stifle debate on substance by creating diversion or just try to smother debate alltogether. I thinks' Jack's point below is right on as that tactic is employed on these foums as well, and i know i've been a target of this myself:

Jack Gilder wrote:
The usual pattern is that a subject is presented and then the response will be an often baseless attack of the premise with insults. When the person who presented the material defends their position the response to that is often more insult and innuendo from people that are uncomfortable with the direction that the evidence is taking the discussion.
Look in politics today, if you don't like the message attack the messenger (see Cindy Sheehan as an example).
I think it's great people here discuss politics as I think way too few in this country do. The general public in the US is hideously uneducated about politics and its impact on their lives. That is dangerous as it facilitates the election of bad politcians with potential disastrous outcomes.

I say let the Post forum be as free flowing as possible sans insults etc. Substance is great, jokes, light threads are great.
It does not impede posting on the other threads one bit.

Jack Gilder: Sorry you got singled out, but hey look at all the fame and glory it got you :wink:
User avatar
Cynth
Posts: 6703
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Iowa, USA

Post by Cynth »

missy, my friend, check your messages.
User avatar
Teri-K
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Seattle WA

Post by Teri-K »

This thread has turned into a colossal waste of time. It has gone from anger, hurt, agreement, disagreement, accusation, to improbable resolution. We all have our views and our side of things, which we voice, but it’s done nothing except divide and isolate. The conversations seem to be an exercise in clapping with one hand. Jack’s initial thread was interpreted individually by each reader as it related to their situation. It has boiled down to multiple pages of this group v. that group.

I don’t want to think it’s headed for a very ugly conclusion, but I also don’t want to aid or participate in the possibility. I’ll keep my views to myself and share only in pm.
User avatar
SteveShaw
Posts: 10049
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 4:24 am
antispam: No
Location: Beautiful, beautiful north Cornwall. The Doom Bar is on me.
Contact:

Re: Polluting/spamming the forums

Post by SteveShaw »

MurphyStout wrote:I prolly shouldn't but I feel the need.

There is alot of pollution and spam on the forums these days. No I'm not talking about actual spam but seemingly thoughtless meaningless posts. And I'm also talking about people who feel the need to start a new thread a few times a day and those that feel the need to assualt the rest of us with their religion and politics. <SNIP>
I agree with nearly all you say. A couple of years ago I left The Session in high dudgeon (as someone here snarlingly pointed out to me offlist a few weeks ago!) because I found myself beseiged by contumely after complaining about the high noise-to-signal and the hijacking of threads (you won't be able to find the "entertainment" of the time as all my posts and threads were deleted! :lol: ) . The big difference over here is that the political, whimsical, religious (yikes!) and otherwise non-musical matters are aired over here "in t'pub", and the ITM forum (the only other one of much interest to me personally) is generally allowed to remain civilly on-topic (quiet at times though it be as a result). Nobody's going to change the world by spouting here about their latest hobby-horse, and most people aren't going to keep reading discursive crap that goes on for day after day. The silent majority around here are probably silent because they're just not reading the bilge. The scroll wheel is a great invention!

Steve
"Last night, among his fellow roughs,
He jested, quaff'd and swore."

They cut me down and I leapt up high
I am the life that'll never, never die.
I'll live in you if you'll live in me -
I am the lord of the dance, said he!
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

missy wrote:[

Gee - I'm sorry to be so mean spirited and stupid - which is why I didn't reply to the post in the whistle forum in the first place. I cut and pasted the quotes to THIS forum because, honestly - I don't know how to quote between one forum and put it on another - you know - the stupid part??

As to the rest of your quote "This doesn't mean it can't be done" - that's supposed to make me feel good about adding to the original? Sorry - I read it to mean "it's not usually played that way, although some may do so".

See - again - this is why I don't post to the whistle forum - I'm too stupid and mean spirited..........

Explain to me then why you quote two sentences from the start of my post, ignoring completly the other 80 percent of the post in order to convey the message of the post in a way completely opposite of what was actually written.
Airs are most commonly played as solo pieces and Irish music is a melody driven music. This was an opening statement followed by the 'this doesn't mean it (=harmonising of airs) can't be done to great effect'. I can't take complete twisting of my words to produce an example how discouraging the music fora are in your eyes in no other way than I characterised it above.
Taking on the victim's role, as you do twice here: first as a reason for not posting t othe whislte/fiddle duet thread, and then again as an excuse not to reply to my objections against your post, is not very becoming by the way.
Last edited by Cayden on Sat Aug 27, 2005 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked