I don't think you quite got my point. I love the juxtaposition of a $150 whistle which is way, way beyond anything I would ever consider paying for a whistle and the 'it won't break the bank' that invariably seems to accompany the recommendation.riverman wrote:I agree with Dralore. A musician deserves the best instrument he or she can possibly afford. After all, you experience and play the notes every day. Even with a whistle, a traditional instrument, why play out of tune, or with the buzz that many factory instruments have? If you can spend $7 on a lunch, why not put pennies in a can for a Burke, or Humphrey, or Hoover?
If you like your Burkes, fine, go for it, do as you may you won't hear me objecting but do not pretend they come cheap or even that they offer you an increase in quality over lesser priced whistles equal to their increase in price.
You should get an instrument that matches your abilities, you're right there but you should be realistic and not blame faults caused by deficiencies in your playing on the instrument and pretend they'll go away as soon as you throw money at the problem. The most expensive instrument is not necessarily the best for you and an instrument that is fool proof (i.e. one that will take any amount of abuse and still sound acceptable) doesn't set you on a road to learning more and developing essential skills like breathcontrol.